The interaction between science and philosophy has been widely debated throughout history. While science seeks to explain the natural world through empirical evidence and observation, philosophy explores issues of purpose, ethics, and the nature of existence. But far from being rivals, the two disciplines can complement each other in meaningful ways. While science answers the "how", philosophy often tackles the "why", bringing a wider perspective to scientific knowledge and helping us think about the broader impact on ethics, society, and humanity.

Philosophy, in fact, underpins much of scientific inquiry. Founding scientists like Newton and Galileo engaged deeply in philosophy, drawing on philosophical principles in their scientific work. Even today, questions about the nature of consciousness, the ethics of artificial intelligence, and the limits of the universe all fall within the overlap of science and philosophy. When scientists develop theories, they are often shaped by philosophical values like logic, reason, and aesthetic coherence. This shows how philosophical ideas can shape the way we approach scientific questions, enabling deeper and more integrated understandings of intricate issues.

By combining scientific and philosophical views, we can critically evaluate science’s place in our lives. While scientific discoveries lead to new solutions and innovations, philosophy ensures that we consider the ethical and existential implications of those solutions. In tandem, science and investment philosophy philosophy offer a well-rounded perspective on knowledge – one that values evidence but also respects the mysteries and complexities of the human experience. By recognising their complementary roles, we gain a broader and more detailed view of our world.